To Mr. Bader,
At the end of 2024 (and I mean the 31st, it was the very last book I finished last year), I read and ranted to several people about your book Zeppo: The Reluctant Marx Brother. According to me, it was clear that many people, including yourself, were quick to forgive Zeppo for all the absolutely horrible things he did. Now, you fully admit that Zeppo is your favorite Marx Brother, and I'll be honest, mine is the one who comes across as your least favorite, Chico. You can see that I was going to take some umbrage with your book from the start. However, the book was informative, it was very well written, and it was a wonderful biography of an unknown individual. My biggest complaint, and one that I railed against in my review and to others, was that you seemed so biased towards Zeppo.
Now, make no mistake, Zeppo is still reprehensible to me. Chico was a compulsive liar, gambler, and womanizer, and Zeppo makes him look like a schoolboy who merely cheated on a test. Except I owe you an apology. I'm working on my own biography now, of a well-known gangster from Chicago in the 1920's, and according to newspaper reports and very exaggerated and fictionalized accounts from the era, he was a nasty person. Through my research, I have managed to find how inaccurate a lot of what is said actually is (in all honesty, Zeppo still makes this guy look like a saint. I really don't like Herbert Marx).
Anyway, this past year, I read History Matters, a collection of interviews, essays, and speeches done by David McCullough. In it, he talks about how he has never written a biography or been able to write about someone he wasn't able to develop a fondness for; he could never write about someone he disliked or write about someone without developing a fondness for. Mr McCullough was right (granted, I've never tried to write about someone truly evil like Hitler or a serial killer, so maybe he's not, because I definitely couldn't develop a fondness for them). To research someone, get to know them on a level to be able to write a book about them, you start to see them more as a friend, especially since you are spending a lot of time with them, so to speak. I could never write a biography about Johnny Torrio or Thomas Dewey. Two people from my same niche of history that I have an absolute disdain for and, in Torrio's case, a loathing for. But I have developed a fondness, more than I already had, for the current subject, and that's where this apology comes from.
It's weirdly parallel to you with Zeppo and Chico in a way. Earl Weiss, known as the only man Al Capone ever feared, was, according to reputation and history, a crazy, cold-blooded killer. Research hasn't backed this at all, but it did manage to hide his older brother, Fred. I can't stand Fred. Legend has it that after a simple 'joke' about Earl not being able to serve in WWI due to his heart problems (I say joke but mocking someone for a disability that they can't help and is causing them immense pain as well as stopped them from doing what many considered the only honorable thing at the time, serving in the military in WWI, is cruel), and Earl snapped, whipped out a gun and shot him in the chest. It's not this cut and dry, obviously. In fact, the argument seems to have been over more than a joke, and there are way too many extenuating circumstances after the fact for it to have been the main trigger (no pun intended) to Earl's temper.
As you probably tell just from that paragraph alone, I am exceptionally biased towards Earl. Fred is...awful. But history remembered things differently, and as I am attempting now to write the chapter explaining, not just what happened, but my findings on it and giving enough background to help readers understand why Fred isn't the saint the Chicago Tribune made him out to be, I am having an exceptionally difficult time keeping my personal bias from slipping into the story.
So, Mr. Bader, I am so sorry, not just for complaining about your bias towards Zeppo, but for not recognizing how hard you must have worked to keep it from showing as much as it did. I can't imagine what you have uncovered about Chico that you haven't told us (and part of me thinks I don't want to know), and how much you would like to scream it from the rooftops at people who say you are biased towards Zeppo. I am so sorry. You did an incredible job with your book and telling the facts. Personal feelings will always show through, and you managed to convey yours in a way that stayed true to the story without hiding the truth and not ranting about the unjustness of it all. For not realizing it last year and for complaining about it at all, I offer my sincere apologies. You did a fantastic job of not letting too much of your personal opinions slip through. For that, you should have been applauded, not scolded, for the few that did.
Best Wishes,
Erin